Essay
Grading Criteria
AThe
paper is more than accurate and error-free; it is strikingly
will-written and well-argued. In the best A-papers,
a human voice seems to speak: it has something to say,
says it clearly and gracefully and supports it fully.
A thesis rich enough to lend itself to interesting development
and support; detailed understanding of the question
and text; sound organization; clear, unambiguous sentences,
sentence lengths vary exhibiting some of all of the
following: subordination, parallel structure, accurate
use of sophisticated punctuation, including colons,
semicolons, and dashes if appropriate.
BA
solid, commendable paper that fulfills the assignment.
The writer has an interesting point to make and makes
it in an organized and competent way. Clear, sufficiently
complex thesis supported by an intelligent argument
and judicious reference to the text; a well-organized
argument, connected with appropriate signals of identity
or transition which highlight the structure of the argument;
quotations or examples, if used, advance or support
the argument where it needs support; standard correct
punctuation; some variation of sentence length and structure;
perhaps a slightly awkward style at moments; a few minor
mechanical errors.
CThe
paper may make some good points and may demonstrate
understanding of both the text and the question, but
the argument is not as rich, detailed and well-supported
as it should be in a college paper; stylistic problems
come between the reader and the argument. Thesis may
have support, but is weakened by inaccurate discussion
of the text; many minor mechanical errors, perhaps some
major ones; narrative summary of the text outweighs
argument, analysis, and interpretation; examples may
be given for their own sake (just to fill up space);
quotations may be used poorly (material quoted out of
context, misquoted, quoted unnecessarily); sentence
structures tangled or unvaried; organization rambles
or disappears; words misused or misspelled; diction
inconsistent; proofreading weak.
DThesis
missing; major mechanical problems; poor organization;
serious misreadings of the text; stretches in which
the writer simply gives a narrative account of the reading
for no apparent reason; paper much shorter then the
assigned length; paper doesnt make a point.
FThe
paper is not handed in; plagiarized in part or in whole;
unacceptably shorter than the assigned length. |